It has been made apparent that the United States is still debating over whether or not this is a true addiction or not. They try to apply reasons for why someone would want to be on the internet for prolonged periods of time, which is an approach that can be used for pretty much any addiction.
As stated in our presentation, the American Psychiatric Association, has yet to agree on including it in their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. They are currently considering to compromise on adding it in an appendix.
One study has shown that only 1% of college-level introductory and abnormal psychology books even make a reference to Internet addiction.[1]
A more shocking study revealed that while 84% of college counselors "agree" or "strongly agree" that Internet Addiction Disorder is legitimate, 93% have "some, but not sufficient training" or "no training" on diagnosing Internet Addiction Disorder, and 94% have "no training" or "some, but not sufficient training" on the treatment of Internet Addiction Disorder.[2]
So not only is the United States seemingly avoiding the issue and trying to blame other things, they hardly even try to provide any resources on helping people with a heavy dependence on the Internet for non-essential use.
[1],
[2]